Search Courses

Journal SAM 44-2: A VMAT planning technique for locally advanced breast cancer patients with expander or implant reconstructions requiring comprehensive postmastectomy radiation therapy

Course Details

CEUs: 2.5

Available Until: 7/31/2020

Non-Member Price: $87.50

Member Price: $50.00

Member PLUS Price: $50.00

Add to My Courses

Once you have exceeded your annual free credit allowance you will be prompted to pay a per-credit fee.

Courses purchased using your credit allowance are non-refundable and need to be completed before their expiration date

View your annual credit allowance here.

LiCheng Kuo, MSc ∗, ∗∗, ˚Ase M. Ballangrud, PhD ∗, Alice Y. Ho, MD † , James G. Mechalakos, PhD ∗, Guang Li, PhD ∗, Linda Hong, PhD ∗
∗Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA † Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA

Locally advanced breast cancer patients with expander or implant reconstructions who require comprehensive postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) can pose unique treatment planning challenges. Traditional 3D conformal radiation techniques often result in large dose inhomogeneity throughout the treatment volumes, inadequate target coverage, or excessive normal tissue doses. We have developed a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning technique without entering through the ipsilateral arm that produced adequate target volume coverage, excellent homogeneity throughout the target volume, and acceptable doses to the normal structures. Twenty left-sided and 10 right-sided patients with either ipsilateral or bilateral permanent implants or tissue expanders who received comprehensive PMRT between October 2014 and February 2016 were included in this study. Ten left-sided cases used deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique, and others used free breathing (FB). Planning target volume (PTV) included chest wall, internal mammary nodes (IMNs), supraclavicular, and axillary lymph nodes. A VMAT plan using 4 or 5 partial arcs with 6 MV photon beam avoiding entering through the ipsilateral arm was generated for each patient. Prescription dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. PTV coverage, maximum depth of IMNs, dose homogeneity and dose to the heart, lungs, thyroid, contralateral intact breast or implant, liver, stomach, left anterior descending artery, ipsilateral brachial plexus, esophagus, spinal cord, and total MU were evaluated. PTV D95% (Gy) was 49.6 ±0.9, 48.7 ±0.9, and 49.5 ±1.1; PTV D05% (Gy) was 55.7 ±0.6, 55.1 ±1.4, and 55.0 ±0.7; maximum depth of IMNs (cm) was 4.3 ±0.9, 4.6 ±1.1, and 4.9 ±2.3; ipsilateral lung, V20Gy (%) was 29.0 ±2.1, 28.8 ±2.5, and 27.5 ±3.4; heart mean dose (Gy) was 4.2 ±0.4, 7.5 ±1.1, and 6.6 ±0.8 for right-sided FB, left-sided FB, and left-sided DIBH cases, respectively. D95% of IMNs all received 100% prescription dose. The maximum dose (Gy) to the left anterior descending artery was 33.8 ±11.7 for left-sided FB and 31.4 ±7.3 for left-sided DIBH. VMAT technique avoiding ipsilateral arm can produce acceptable clinical plans for locally advanced breast cancer patients with expander or implant reconstructions receiving comprehensive PMRT.